Tag Archives: Pitt

And They’re Off!

Penn State stumbled a bit coming out of the gate, but the Lions found their stride en route to a 52-zip rout of the Akron Zips last Saturday.  The weather was less than ideal, (it sucked!) but didn’t seem to affect the players whatsoever.

FeartheRoo

FEAR?  REALLY?  SERIOUSLY?????

PSU took the opening drive down the field as if the Zips hadn’t even shown up.  Unfortunately, their one highlight of the day was a pick in the end zone which cost us a score on the opening drive.

Add in a missed field goal and a kick-off out of bounds, and there is little left to criticize.

There were a few drops by Hamilton, and McSorley completed a couple of passes that, had he thrown them better, would have been touchdowns, but the receivers had to dive to catch them instead of taking them in stride.  But who’s Nitt-picking?

Did I mention the weather sucked?!

I heard one (Pitt) fan opine afterward, “since when does Penn State run up the score?”

Let’s settle this right here.  Penn State did put up 52 points.  Are they not supposed to play just to spare the feelings of the other team?  What did Akron expect when they scheduled this game?  (A big paycheck–that is what they expected and that is what they got!)  It is not possible (and certainly not advisable) to play a top 25 team every week.  It is a given that teams will play opponents that are out of their league.

Alabama is playing Mercer.  Florida State is playing Delaware State.  I could go on and on.  That’s the way football schedules are today.  Some teams will play tougher schedules.  Good for them.  They can then use that to argue away a loss if they want to.

Penn State had to play Akron on Saturday.  That was the team scheduled to play.  McSorley and Barkley had no choice in that matter.  They wanted to play their best regardless of the opponent.

Should they not have played the second half?  Come on!  It’s the first game of the season!  They need some real game practice time.  They learn nothing sitting on the bench.  And maybe they have an outside shot at a Heisman.  Is it fair to bench them and deny them a once-in-a-lifetime accolade because we don’t want to hurt Akron’s feelings?  Maybe if they don’t want to lose 52-0, they should not schedule a big check from PSU or maybe they should have prepared and recruited better?

And if a large margin of victory is equated with “running up the score” then this is not unfamiliar territory for Penn State.  48-14 against Pitt?  81-0 against Cincinnati?  66-10 versus Coastal Carolina.  PSU beat Rutgers 59-34, with McQueary throwing a TD pass in the final minute.  This led to a heated exchange between Paterno and Doug Graber after the game.  Apparently the BACKUP QB changed the play at the line of scrimmage and hit the open receiver.  Paterno later said, “I should not have to apologize for Mike doing what he has been coached to do.”

I, for one, didn’t buy a ticket so I could watch Barkley sit on the bench.

Is it fair that Akron continues competing and trying to avoid a shut out (the primary goal of EVERY defense is a shut out) while PSU heads into the locker room early?  I think not.

And while the timing of the back-up quarterback entering the game can be disputed–you have to weigh game experience versus the risk of injury more so than the margin of victory on the scoreboard–Penn State did play a lot of players that were not starters throughout the second half.

And in the end, the coaches, players and probably even the pollsters know that Penn State’s fate come bowl season will depend not on whether we beat Akron 35-0, 45-0 or 75-0 but rather whether we beat Ohio State, THEM, and the other potential pitfalls in the Big Ten and out of conference schedule.

THE NUMBERS GAME:

Penn State out-gained Akron 569-159 yards, and the Zips managed only 73 on the ground.  What more could you ask for?  Akron ran 63 plays to Penn State’s 65.  The Zips won time of possession by half a minute.  And while the Lions were only 3-9 on third down, they punted only TWICE.

Each team had one interception.

Penn State came in ranked #6.  With a Florida State loss, there is a chance to move up.

Attendance was 101,684.  I was a little impressed that we did that well given the weather conditions and the Labor Day weekend with the students off on Monday.  Some people might complain, but I thought it was a good crowd with a better than expected energy level given the quality of the opponent.

THE BIG (TEN) PICTURE:

The Buckeyes jumped out to a 1-0 lead in the conference by virtue of a win over Indiana.  The Hoosiers made a game of it for a half, but faded down the stretch, losing 49-21 after leading at the half.

The Wolverines defeated Florida 33-17, and Maryland upset Texas 51-41 in a shoot out.

Northwestern struggled early as well, but beat Nevada 31-20.

Iowa handled Wyoming 24-3.

Purdue lost to Louisville 35-28 which had to rally to defeat the Boilermakers.

The Spartans beat Bowling Green 35-10, and Illinois notched a 24-21 victory over Ball State.  The Cornhuskers eked a out a win over Arkansas State 43-36, while the Badgers routed Utah State 59-10.

Minnesota managed to beat Buffalo 17-7 while Rutgers fell 30-14 to #8 Washington.

AROUND THE NATION:

Alabama took Florida State out of the early running with a decisive 24-7 win.

USC struggled early but finally put away Western Michigan 49-31.

Clemson took Kent State to the woodshed 56-3.

LOOKING AHEAD:

Pitt.

PittPanter

PITT PANTER

That’s it.  Just Pitt.

The Lions are currently about a 20.5 favorite.

While Penn State dominated hapless Akron, Pitt went to OT with Youngstown State.

So Penn State should just walk away with a win next week, right?

Wrong!

Akron is near the bottom of the Bowl Subdivision teams.  Youngstown State, on the other hand, was ranked 9th pres-season in the FCS.  We’re comparing apples to oranges here.

That said, this is not the same Pitt team that beat PSU last year, and I think we are better this year.  And don’t forget that that Pitt team went on to give Clemson their only loss.  Again, though, this is not that Pitt team.

I predict PSU will win.  I think we will cover the spread–too many weapons, and Pitt gave up 418 yards, including 311 in the air.  Doesn’t matter if they gave it up to YSU, KSU or Our Lady of the Blessed Sacrament.  Penn State is going to score some points.

This is a rivalry game, whether any of us want to admit it or not.  I’m old enough to remember the rivalry of the 70-80’s.  Losing to them last year was bad enough–but when it cost us a spot in the play-offs–well, that’s a panther of a different color.  I’m not a big fan of the revenge factor, but I’m hoping it gives our team a little more adrenaline and inspiration this week.

Game time is 3:30 at Beaver Stadium.  I think we start slow, but keep things close through the half, and then pull away late in the game as our arsenal of weapons becomes too much to handle.

 

Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under college football, Penn State, sports, Uncategorized

Journalistic Faux Pitt

This appeared in the December 29th issue of the Altoona Mirror:

psufauxpas

Pitt, indeed, lost the Pinstripe Bowl.

psufauxpas2

But look closely at the score summary for the bowl game:

psufauxpas3

Holy Crap!  Not only did I not know PSU was in the Pinstripe Bowl again, I had no idea we lost to Northwestern!  This is the reason we lost to USC in the Rose Bowl!  They jinxed us!

Or maybe the proofreader was still on Christmas vacation.

Leave a comment

Filed under college football, Penn State, Uncategorized

Definition of Pitt Football

From Sports Illustrated’s Campus Union . . . 100 Things We’re most Excited for in the 2014 Season . . .

82. Pittsburgh’s attempt to enter ACC contention There are certain college football teams that exude confidence, precision and ferocity. Oregon is a screaming attack fighter. Alabama is a fearsome, unyielding tank. Pitt, on the other hand? Pitt is an overweight mail clerk rolling backwards down a hill in an office chair. Wide receiver Tyler Boyd is pretty good, though.

Pitt Football . . . Are you ready to RUMBLE?

Pitt Football . . . Are you ready to RUMBLE?

1 Comment

Filed under Humor